Summary of activities
The project commenced with a stakeholder forum, which had, in attendance, Traditional Heads, Government Officials, Community Conservation Management Teams, and community members. The forum included the introduction of project purpose and activities, and solicited the participation of all stakeholders in conserving crocodiles. After this forum, nuclear focus group discussions with all parties continued to determine the current impacts of introduced belief systems on crocodile conservation, threats to the species, the effectiveness of traditional conservation policies and activities, and unravel the historic relationship between the indigenes and the species.
Ecological surveys conducted aided the assessment of the species-habitat association and population. The spotlight count method (Letnic and Connors, 2006) was employed. Line transects along the edge of ponds since the rains had reduced and catchment water receded, exposing enough bear-ground were established. Transects were walked during the hours of 18:00pm to 10:00pm GMT. All individuals seen were counted and their age class determined. Habitat conditions were categorized into intact, moderate and severe condition classes. Anthropogenic activities assessed included farming, fishing, organic and plastic pollution.
Socio-economic questionnaire administration:
We conducted socio-economic studies aimed at determining community members’ perception of the impacts of introduced belief systems on the conservation of crocodiles. Questionnaires were administered to individuals of all social classes, profession, and religion. The questionnaire administration was done in the local languages. In addition, Traditional and Opinion leaders were interviewed to reveal the traditional systems applied to regulate conservation activities of the crocodiles.
Conservation education & Behaviour Change:
The project team engaged community members through house-to-house meetings and focus groups discussions. Through this medium, the project team explained the significance of living together harmoniously with nature to community members. Although this was rather a slow process of meeting and interacting with members, it was more effective as participants were able to ask questions and share their unique perspectives on the issues. The adoption of this approach was occasioned due to the COVID-19 restrictions which did not permit mass gathering of people.
Population of crocodiles determined for two main water systems in Paga:
At the end of the project, crocodile habitats and priority areas supporting the life activities (nesting and hibernation sites) were identified. Viable crocodile densities, habitat association, and existing anthropogenic activities in these areas were determined. A total of 120 crocodiles were encountered during the survey. Habitat and other priority areas conditions were below the ecological functioning threshold capable of supporting the species: requiring further conservation efforts. Identified anthropogenic activities included fishing, plastic and organic waste disposal, fuelwood collection, and washing of clothing in water bodies.
Improved attitudes and understanding towards Crocodile conservation:
Community and stakeholder conservation education engagement yielded positive behavioral change towards the crocodile conservation. Community members upon education agreed to desist from detrimental anthropogenic activities that will alter the life activities of crocodiles. An all-inclusion gender approach was employed to involve women in the education aspect of the project and engage them in community decision processes. Inclusion of women in the conservation decision making process increased participation and thus ensured sustainable grassroots support for crocodiles.
Priority actions for Crocodile conservation determined.
This project has resulted in key priority decision towards the preservation of local culture and traditions, and the conservation of crocodiles for the long-term. These decisions are even more timely as the global COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the ecotourism potential of the pond which was the sole source of revenue for the management of the crocodile ponds. Accordingly, stakeholders resolved to integrate the traditional history of crocodiles into the celebration of the local Foi festival for the benefit of the younger generation. Stakeholders further agreed to mobilize community actions and support to desilt the ponds and remove plastics which results in annual drying of the ponds, and detrimental to the crocodiles’ survival. The stakeholder meeting resulted in the formation of Crocodile Watchdog Committee which comprises of volunteers who are committed to patrol the banks of the ponds at night to prevent encroachment and illegal fishing.
Project implementation had few challenges beginning with the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. This situation restricted movement, and thus the project timeline had to be modified to suit government’s regulations. This affected some activities including presentation in mosques and in churches and community gatherings.
Social distance restrictions limited the number of people who could be engaged within a given time and space. Therefore, the team had to spend more days in the field in order to engage people in their households and in smaller groups.
Another challenge this project encountered was budgetary constraints. To achieve the project goals, the team had to spend on some safety protocols that were not initially budgeted for. These included the setting up of hand washing stations within the project communities, the procurement of hand sanitizers for local communities and purchasing of branded facemask. The facemasks were branded with the logos of NEBF and ECOMAF to further create awareness about the project and acknowledge the support of the NEBF.
Most of the challenges faced by this project was beyond the control of the project team. They were occasioned by the global COVID-19 pandemic. Measures that were taken were swift to address the challenges and to make way for the successful implementation of the project. In hindsight, the project would have been implemented as described in the project proposal. The project team would have loved to have mass gathering of people for our conservation education campaigns, as such atmosphere elicit the right response to our educational messages.
The project team would have loved to engage students and youth on whose ideals and beliefs the future of conservation hinges.
The use of local radio would have offered a chance to reach broader audience in the event of the COVID-19 but were not budgeted for as the pandemic was not anticipated.
This current work could not asses all the communities and rivers anticipated. In the coming years, the project will be expanded to assess crocodile populations in other communities that were not covered in this current project.
The project aims to create a sustainable platform where the local cultures and traditions on crocodiles will be strengthened within the communities and be inculcated in the younger generations.
The project further plans to desilt the ponds and completely halt all illegal activities on the pond as well revegetate degraded land cover. We hope to build an art and culture centre which will provide opportunities for local women to sell local artefacts and crafts to tourist. A database for all traditional areas and their crocodile species populations will also be developed with monitoring measures established to evaluate the population dynamics of the species.
Finally, a national forum for all traditional areas engaged in the project will be held in association with all national statutory institutions relevant to natural resource management and conservation, to develop a national Traditional Conservation Action Policy (TCAP) for all crocodile species of Ghana.
Future financial support
This project will seek more funding from foundations and individuals as well as organisations committed to biodiversity conservation. Already, the project has submitted a letter of inquiry to the New England Biolabs Foundation (NEBF) for consideration towards the next phase of the project. Also, in-kind contribution for the next phase of the project will be given by the beneficiary communities.